tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32546160.post3833483507772562915..comments2024-03-01T21:25:50.289+11:00Comments on astropixie: WMAP - "double-U map"Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14621483772952311458noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32546160.post-84421361435412585552008-03-16T04:39:00.000+11:002008-03-16T04:39:00.000+11:00According to Louisa, we have:baryonic matter 4.6%,...According to Louisa, we have:<BR/>baryonic matter 4.6%, dark matter 23.3%, dark energy (antigravitation)<BR/>72.1 %. <BR/>http://riofriospacetime.blogspot.com/<BR/>Interesting results, but how can this<BR/>(backround microwave radiation) prove tje Big Bang, which is the theory of<BR/>main stream cosmologs? Are the theories of Arthur Eddington and Fred Hoyle wrong?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32546160.post-54299582970308348332008-03-14T03:03:00.000+11:002008-03-14T03:03:00.000+11:00Just so you see how old I am, when I started study...Just so you see how old I am, when I started studying astronomy, there was no dark energy!. The supernovae result was not out yet. The universe was 70% dark matter and 30% visible matter when I took introductory astronomy. The Hubble constant was still in the ranges you mention and the age of the universe was considerable longer... our notion of the universe has changed sooo much in the last Evahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02032149611063541185noreply@blogger.com